Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add an archive task to GEFS system to archive files in HPSS #2895

Open
wants to merge 124 commits into
base: develop
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

AntonMFernando-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor

@AntonMFernando-NOAA AntonMFernando-NOAA commented Sep 7, 2024

Description

Type of change

Change characteristics

  • Is this a breaking change (a change in existing functionality)? NO
  • Does this change require a documentation update? NO
  • Does this change require an update to any of the following submodules? NO

How has this been tested?

  • CI test in HERA and HERCULES

Checklist

  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published
  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • New and existing tests pass with my changes
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation if necessary

@AntonMFernando-NOAA AntonMFernando-NOAA changed the title Add an archive task to GEFS system to archive files to HPSS Add an archive task to GEFS system to archive files in HPSS Sep 7, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@EricSinsky-NOAA EricSinsky-NOAA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here are some initial suggestions.

parm/archive/gefs.yaml.j2 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
parm/archive/gefs.yaml.j2 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@AntonMFernando-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

AntonMFernando-NOAA commented Sep 18, 2024

@EricSinsky-NOAA @WalterKolczynski-NOAA Ready for review. Advice whether the DO_EXTRACTVARS condition should be included in master_gefs.yaml.j2 (@EricSinsky-NOAA thinks it might not be necessary).

Copy link
Contributor

@EricSinsky-NOAA EricSinsky-NOAA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Here are some suggestions based on my testing of a GEFS replay test case.

parm/archive/gefs_extracted_atmos.yaml.j2 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
parm/archive/gefs_extracted_atmos.yaml.j2 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
parm/archive/gefs_extracted_atmos.yaml.j2 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
parm/archive/gefs_extracted_wave.yaml.j2 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@AntonMFernando-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@EricSinsky-NOAA @WalterKolczynski-NOAA @DavidHuber-NOAA The PR is ready to review.

Comment on lines +8 to +11
{% include "gefs_extracted_atmos.yaml.j2" %}
{% include "gefs_extracted_ocean.yaml.j2" %}
{% include "gefs_extracted_ice.yaml.j2" %}
{% include "gefs_extracted_wave.yaml.j2" %}
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why the extracted? Is this intended to be run only when running with DO_EXTRACTVARS=YES? If not, then I suggest dropping the _extracted.

Copy link
Contributor

@EricSinsky-NOAA EricSinsky-NOAA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think we are getting close. Just a couple more suggestions.

parm/archive/gefs_extracted_ocean.yaml.j2 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
parm/archive/gefs_extracted_wave.yaml.j2 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
parm/archive/gefs_extracted_ocean.yaml.j2 Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@AntonMFernando-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

@EricSinsky-NOAA @DavidHuber-NOAA Made all the suggested changes. If @WalterKolczynski-NOAA agrees with the renaming of gefs_extract_<product.yaml.j2> files I think this is ready for CI test.

Copy link
Contributor

@EricSinsky-NOAA EricSinsky-NOAA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good with regard to satisfying the current GEFS reforecast archiving requirements. If one of the GEFS archiving requirements changes, I think this can be addressed in a future PR. Thank you for establishing the GEFS archive task, Anton.

@AntonMFernando-NOAA
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks good with regard to satisfying the current GEFS reforecast archiving requirements. If one of the GEFS archiving requirements changes, I think this can be addressed in a future PR. Thank you for establishing the GEFS archive task, Anton.

Thanks, Eric.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants